Ive done both, but i will go with Supercharger for ease of install and less hassles... speaking from experience of course

__________________

I love the sound of a blower wine.!!!!!!!!!

__________________
MY WHIPS!!!

1965 Ford Mustang Fastback
Mods: 351W, T-5, 4 wheel disc Brakes
1994 Mercury Topaz
2005 Chrysler Sebring Touring

Turbo rep right here. Whooooosh, pssssst
SS

Turbo.

__________________

Blower all the way..With the money you save frome a blower you can buy heads cam and intake..And still have a car in the tens.

Why bother potentially wasting expensive parts when you can bolt on a $5,000 turbo kit (or $2,000 if you DIY) and make enough power to break the stock motor in half?
SS

Well, my I really like N/A the best. Not the power adders are not awsome, I just like all motor!!!

__________________
MY WHIPS!!!

1965 Ford Mustang Fastback
Mods: 351W, T-5, 4 wheel disc Brakes
1994 Mercury Topaz
2005 Chrysler Sebring Touring

i aggre with stang6589 on the n/a motor setups, but there is always room for extras.

when i was building my car turbo was always sitting in the corner of my mind for a future add on.

__________________
TREMEK.COM

I love a nice N/A motor setup. I'm a sucker for a well built long rod 302 that makes power up to 7500RPM, that would be one of a few N/A motors that I might take over a turbo setup.
To this day I still have a dream of building a near stock 302 with stock heads/intake/short block but fully balanced, 5 angle valve job, 1.6 roller rockers, zero gap pistons, coated pistons, shotpeened rods, polished and knife edged crank, custom grind "NHRA stock" cam, long tube headers, 2.5" exhaust etc..... I want to hit the 300hp flywheel mark with an almost stock 302.
SS