Advertisement

Welcome to STANGFAN.COM - Ford Mustang ranch for pictures, mustang videos & chat..  
Members

Thread: The Dark Years
View Single Post
Old 12-09-2007, 03:18 PM   #21 (permalink)
 
Default
Stang Seller
Member
 
Stang Seller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: North York
Posts: 393
Rep Power: 0 Stang Seller is on a distinguished road
iTrader: 0 / 0%

Mustang Details
Year: 1988
Model: LX
Transmission: Automatic
Color: Stolen :(
Geez, just because you own one and it's YOUR favourite Mustang doesn't mean I can't voice my opinion that I think it's the fugliest thing to bear the Mustangs name. It's a PINTO for God's sakes!
So you knock the Fox for running a 255ci V8, but in your book it's ok that the Pinto, I mean Mustang II didn't have a V8 in 74 because "The V8 issue for the 74's is easily fixed". The Fox Mustang ran from 79-93, and in extension all the way up til 2004 with a modified chassis. Are you really going to tell me the II was a better car because it sold more units during the disco 70's? How many championships has the Mustang II won? And do you really think because a car "resembles" it's original that it's better overall or even better looking than one which doesn't??? That's got to be the most far reaching arguement ever!
Don't get your panties in a bunch because we strongly dislike your car, I couldn't care less if you hate Fox Stangs but don't be a hypocrite! And get over yourself, Mustang II's are ugly and that's the bottom line.
SS
Stang Seller is offline   Reply With Quote
 
» Advertiser
Remove Ads!


» eBay Mustangs
» Current Poll
Would you hit it?
Absolutely - 88.89%
8 Votes
Maybe - 11.11%
1 Vote
Not so much... - 0%
0 Votes
Total Votes: 9
You may not vote on this poll.
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.0.1

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:52 PM.

Stangfan.Com Ford Mustang Forum is in no way affiliated with Ford Motor Company. We are a Ford Mustang enthusiast community.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
stangfan.com

Page generated in 1.00538 seconds with 13 queries